The Commons guidelines specifically permit for competing implementations, and I think both would probably be a fit here. Though, I think if the Mapper had a page more like David's, and an example application, it would be accessible to more developers ;-) (including me).
Rey Francois wrote: > > Having a validation framework in the Jakarta commons is a great idea, the > Java community would definitely benefit from this. There is one JSR which > should go into this direction, but that JSR seems kind of quiet from the > outsider's prospective I have: see the JavaServer Faces JSR on > http://www.jcp.org/jsr/detail/127.jsp. The Mapper framework I've created > could also be a good candidate (see > http://husted.com/struts/resources/mapper.zip). I'm sure there are many more > contenders out there -I just saw a reply in this thread about Barracuda- so > I expect this topic to last, or die! > > Fr. > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
