I still haven't had time to use the Mapper, but I think a transformation package would be valuable to developers. Multiple validation packages in commons could still share a some common code for checking for valid max length, e-mails, credit cards, etc.
David --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Commons guidelines specifically permit for > competing > implementations, and I think both would probably be > a fit here. Though, > I think if the Mapper had a page more like David's, > and an example > application, it would be accessible to more > developers ;-) (including > me). > > Rey Francois wrote: > > > > Having a validation framework in the Jakarta > commons is a great idea, the > > Java community would definitely benefit from this. > There is one JSR which > > should go into this direction, but that JSR seems > kind of quiet from the > > outsider's prospective I have: see the JavaServer > Faces JSR on > > http://www.jcp.org/jsr/detail/127.jsp. The Mapper > framework I've created > > could also be a good candidate (see > > http://husted.com/struts/resources/mapper.zip). > I'm sure there are many more > > contenders out there -I just saw a reply in this > thread about Barracuda- so > > I expect this topic to last, or die! > > > > Fr. > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
