Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> We've refined the commons-logging APIs, and documented the mechanics. In
> addition, I've heard from numerous people on various projects that would
> like to use these APIs, but are hesitant to do so without a 1.0 release.
>
> Therefore, I'd like to now propose that we do a 1.0 release of the
> commons-logging package, based on the current contents of the CVS
> repository for this package. I will volunteer to act as release manager,
> following the standard process for Commons packages:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases.html
>
> ----- CUT HERE -----
> [ ] +1 I support the release of Commons Logging 1.0 and will help
> [ ] +0 I support the release, but cannot help
> [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release
> [ ] -1 I am opposed to this release, and here's why (attach reasons)
> ----- CUT HERE -----
-1
How many logger abstractions do we need? Avalon has a perfectly good one.
(I am not a committer on commons though...).
It looks like a direct rip off of the Avalon logger abstraction, and despite
the work that Peter Donald and I put into it, we get no mention.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
