Scott Sanders wrote:
> Berin, I think that I understand how you feel, and although the
> abstraction was implemented outside of Avalon, I do believe that Avalon
> should be attributed in some way, because it ended up being so close.
>
> What can we do to make this better? The biggest difference that I see
> is that commons-logging is trying to be super small. I want to talk
> this out before I give my +1 on the release. I am willing to try and
> make this better.
>
> I am -0 until I can see completely where Berin is coming from.
I want it documented in the javadocs and/or other documentation where the design
for this originated, and author attributes for the original authors of the
Logger abstraction.
The fact that this is outside of Avalon is beside the point. However, you should
attribute the original source that influenced its design.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
