All this suggestions that I "bigmouthed" my way into becoming a committer depress me! =;o)
This is the ultimate psychological gamble - pushing me into put code instead of words just to have some rest!!! I will try my best at contributing both. Thanks (I guess) and have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:27 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar > > > Welcome aboard Paulo. > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:30 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar > > > > > > +1 > > > > I think the idea is let you commit more code, and spend less > > time lobbying (so you can in turn commit more code, or at > > least more time working). > > > > Typically, committers are nominated along with a new package, > > but I don't see this as a requirement. > > > > I don't see that we could give a developer access to the > > sandbox, but the Commons Proper is a subproject like any > > other, and can elect whatever committer it likes. > > > > Paulo Gaspar wrote: > > > > > > This one got me by surprise. I thought I would have to > > contribute more > > > than the couple of patches I did before. > > > > > > Anyway, everything is upside down: > > > - I am being nominated committer at the commons without being > > > committer elsewhere...; > > > - ...and my direct chief just gave informal authorization to > > > contribute my common code AFTER I told him (via Instant > > > Messaging) I was being voted. > > > > > > Now, I am not bribing you: I think the authorization sticks > > even if I > > > end up getting a negative vote. > > > > > > I also think that the reason he gave me that authorization > > has more to > > > do with a small demo he finally got today. Maybe before he was > > > wondering if all these mailing lists weren't just consuming > > my time. > > > (Strange ideas he has!) > > > =;o) > > > > > > Have fun, > > > Paulo Gaspar > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:30 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar > > > > > > > > > > > > Alright, > > > > > > > > Paulo has a big enough mouth, and he knows where all the > > good code > > > > is, can I have some +1's to get him in to make io, util, codec, > > > > threading, etc. happen. He was a huge help on logging, and other > > > > discussions that I cannot remember. He has quite an intimate > > > > knowledge of a lot of apache code (Avalon, Tomcat, etc), > > and I think > > > > he would be a great addition to the team. > > > > > > > > +1 here. > > > > > > > > Scott Sanders > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For > > additional commands, > > e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA. > > -- Java Web Development with Struts. > > -- Tel +1 585 737-3463. > > -- Web http://www.husted.com/struts/ > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > > additional commands, > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
