On 1/31/02 4:37 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This one got me by surprise. I thought I would have to contribute
> more than the couple of patches I did before.

Nope.

> 
> Anyway, everything is upside down:
> - I am being nominated committer at the commons without being
>  committer elsewhere...;

Not required.  We know you are 'with the band'.

> - ...and my direct chief just gave informal authorization to
>  contribute my common code AFTER I told him (via Instant
>  Messaging) I was being voted.

That's enough!  Just apologize later if anything goes wrong...
 
> Now, I am not bribing you: I think the authorization sticks even
> if I end up getting a negative vote.

Looks like you are in - not a worry.
 
> I also think that the reason he gave me that authorization has
> more to do with a small demo he finally got today. Maybe before
> he was wondering if all these mailing lists weren't just
> consuming my time. (Strange ideas he has!)

Seem to consume a fair bit of my time...

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
POC lives!


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to