As an incompatible change, it should be a release 2.0. You can't externalize an old SequencedHashMap and bring it back as a new one.
+1 on a new release of Collections, though. > -----Original Message----- > From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:46 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers > Subject: Collections 1.1? > > > Hi all, > > If the reimplementation of SequencedHashMap passes muster and > if we cook up > a more satisfying LRUMap implementation, that may be a good reason to > perform a 1.1 release of Collections. I think it's > definitely a good idea, > and I'm willing to volunteer as a release manager. Does > anyone have other > work they would like to include in this release? (I know > Michael has some > pending patches, if anyone is feeling ambitious.) > > - Morgan > > P.S. BTW, I don't think we tagged the 1.0 release code in > CVS. We should > probably start doing that. > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
