Oh, that. Nah, I think that maintaining the External format should be pretty easy. I wrote a unit test for LRUMap externalization last week, so as long as we can pass it we'll be OK.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:53 PM Subject: RE: Collections 1.1? > LRUMap does, so using SequencedHashMap to reimplement LRU, which is a good > idea, would be an incompatible change. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:44 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: Collections 1.1? > > > > > > AFAIK SequencedHashMap has never implemented Externalizable. Right? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steve Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:58 PM > > Subject: RE: Collections 1.1? > > > > > > > As an incompatible change, it should be a release 2.0. > > > > > > You can't externalize an old SequencedHashMap and bring it > > back as a new > > > one. > > > > > > +1 on a new release of Collections, though. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:46 PM > > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers > > > > Subject: Collections 1.1? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > If the reimplementation of SequencedHashMap passes muster and > > > > if we cook up > > > > a more satisfying LRUMap implementation, that may be a > > good reason to > > > > perform a 1.1 release of Collections. I think it's > > > > definitely a good idea, > > > > and I'm willing to volunteer as a release manager. Does > > > > anyone have other > > > > work they would like to include in this release? (I know > > > > Michael has some > > > > pending patches, if anyone is feeling ambitious.) > > > > > > > > - Morgan > > > > > > > > P.S. BTW, I don't think we tagged the 1.0 release code in > > > > CVS. We should > > > > probably start doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
