On 21 Feb 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote:

> The package consists of utilities for several different arenas of use, I
> think it's nice keeping them under the util umbrella but things could be
> split out into separate packages and what if from these different
> packages separate JARs could be produced? People could then take the
> biggie if they wanted or, for example, take commons-util-file.jar
> separately. But if these were in separate modules that would bother me
> either, I just like the util family name.

I'm very in favour of having a higher level release which consists only of
a collection of the sub-projects. What I call a CommonsCore, but could
have any name.

Bay


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to