On 21 Feb 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote: > The package consists of utilities for several different arenas of use, I > think it's nice keeping them under the util umbrella but things could be > split out into separate packages and what if from these different > packages separate JARs could be produced? People could then take the > biggie if they wanted or, for example, take commons-util-file.jar > separately. But if these were in separate modules that would bother me > either, I just like the util family name. I'm very in favour of having a higher level release which consists only of a collection of the sub-projects. What I call a CommonsCore, but could have any name. Bay -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [betwixt] coupling to digester Jason van Zyl
- Re: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 robert burrell donkin
- Re: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Daniel Rall
- [PATCH] commons/xdocs/components.xml Daniel Rall
- Re: [PATCH] commons/xdocs/component... robert burrell donkin
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Scott Sanders
- Re: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Daniel Rall
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Scott Sanders
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Waldhoff, Rodney
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Jason van Zyl
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Waldhoff, Rodney
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 bayard
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Lavandowska
- Re: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate ... Daniel Rall
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate ... Steven Caswell
- Re: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Daniel Rall
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Waldhoff, Rodney
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 bayard
- RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 Michael A. Smith
