<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 21 Feb 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> The package consists of utilities for several different arenas of use, I >> think it's nice keeping them under the util umbrella but things could be >> split out into separate packages and what if from these different >> packages separate JARs could be produced? People could then take the >> biggie if they wanted or, for example, take commons-util-file.jar >> separately. But if these were in separate modules that would bother me >> either, I just like the util family name. > > I'm very in favour of having a higher level release which consists only of > a collection of the sub-projects. What I call a CommonsCore, but could > have any name.
I like that idea. A package which included Collections, IO, and Util would be immediatley useful to me. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
