Leading to: Test: TestObject, TestSerialization, ... ???
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Daniel Rall wrote: > "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Right now, I'm not positive that there would be enough common operations to > > make it worthwhile, but I think it's worth considering. Perhaps: > > > > Lang: TestObject, ? > > IO: TestSerialization, ? > > Collections: TestMap, TestCollection, TestList, ? > > A promising idea. Any reason not to include the more > generic/re-usable classes in the main JAR? > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
