On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > Is that not also the case with Log4J and JDK 1.4? > Only the Avalon logger has a notion of IoC AFAIK. It > seems odd to be supporting IoC logging in > commons-logging, when we know that all of our other > components will not be able to utilize it.
Please move the discussion about IoC and Avalon to avalon-dev. The proposal didn't mentioned IoC and I don't see how this get into this. Most of the components implement Beans patterns and should support runtime changes to config ( JMX or not ). That has nothing to do with any inversion of control, it's standard java. Avalon and IoC are 'special' in that they require only one way to do things - and that's not something we'll do in commons or other projects. But that's their problem, not ours. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
