> I too like the ComparatorUtils concept outlined below.
> However, we might
> want to consider whether the method names are nullFirst(Comparator) or
> nullFirstComparator(Comparator) etc. I raise this because
> PredicateUtils
> uses the latter at the moment, and it would be nice to be
> consistent (we
> could change PredicateUtils if required).
Hm. I always favor shorter names, especially when the longer
names are redundant...the ComparatorUtils I submitted uses the
shorter names...
What do you think of
Set predicate(Set set, Predicate predicate)
? Is that too nondescript?
-Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
