--------- Original message -------- From: Jack, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I too like the ComparatorUtils concept outlined below. > > However, we might > > want to consider whether the method names are nullFirst(Comparator) or > > nullFirstComparator(Comparator) etc. I raise this because > > PredicateUtils > > uses the latter at the moment, and it would be nice to be > > consistent (we > > could change PredicateUtils if required).
> Hm. I always favor shorter names, especially when the longer > names are redundant...the ComparatorUtils I submitted uses the > shorter names... > What do you think of > Set predicate(Set set, Predicate predicate) > ? Is that too nondescript? Actually, there is another factor involved. The java.utils.Collections class uses the long form, eg. Collections.unmodifiableMap(Map); Thus I would prefer the long form. We could agree to differ from Sun however, in which case I would submit a patch to the Predicate code. Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
