> we could even make them public classes and allow users to > extend them on > their own (using the XXXUtils.whatever methods as convenience methods)
Well, yes...but we'd be adding like 30 classes to the public API. Maybe have a separate package for decorators? > FactoryUtils could still be used. Then, if later we add > another type of > factory (I have *no* idea what though), we can keep all the factory > methods in FactoryUtils. > > And actually, we could rename SimpleObjectFactory to just > plain Factory. I'm all for that. -Paul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
