Many bits and pieces of util have graduated, though, into lang and collections.
I don't know how much momentum can be built around a subproject of 'useful code with no natural home', which is the usual operating definition of util. What is frustrating, though, is that almost every project has one, and there is a lot of overlap. On Tuesday 17 September 2002 06:25 pm, Daniel Rall wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > So, which project gets ArrayUtils? [lang] or [collections]? > > > > Things on an ArrayUtils would be > > - a simple toString for arrays based on the ToStringBuilder. > > - Empty array constants for the different array types > > - ... > > I equate array operations more with [lang] than [collections] because > arrays are a core element of the Java language. The existence of > java.util.Arrays also points to [util], but since that project may > never graduate from the sandbox, I favor [lang]. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
