Steve Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Many bits and pieces of util have graduated, though, into lang and > collections. > > I don't know how much momentum can be built around a subproject of 'useful > code with no natural home', which is the usual operating definition of util. > > What is frustrating, though, is that almost every project has one, and there > is a lot of overlap.
Yes, I find it frustrating as well. I created [util] in the first place to try and address the overlap, and it has had success in that it has propogated its code into more specific projects like [lang], [collections], [io], and [codec]. -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
