I haven't got any response/comment on this patch I submitted a week ago.
Some feedback please. >:-)
At 09:56 am 25-09-2002, you wrote:
>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756
>
>[Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Summary|[Patch] |[Patch]
> |CallMethodRule/CallParamRule|CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-25 01:55 -------
>It seems the fix from Bug#11693 has addressed (partly?) the last issue that
>CallMethodRule didn't work correctly in nested situation.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
John Yu
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>