DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756

[Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-09-26 08:46 -------
I second this feature request.

I'm not 100% sure why you would ever want to specify stackPos other than 0, but
other than that I like the provided patch.

I've attached a test case for this feature. The test case will add a new file
CallMethodRuleTestCase.java, which contains all the CallMethodRule/CallParamRule
related tests, some of which moved from RuleTestCase.java, and added an entry to
build.xml. (this is because I believe that the tests concentrating on a single
rule should be in their own dedicated test case).

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to