FYI, for those not on the reorg@apache list: Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't think this should stop us from improving oversight in license compliance issues in jakarta-commons and jakarta-commons-sandbox.Let me ask this question straight out, since no one over on commons-dev@jakarta seems to have any idea what Roy's talking about.Roy, what specific code does your message refer to?Sorry, I made a terrible mistake -- the code I was talking about was in the jakarta-avalon-apps/enterprise repository and has been recently "corrected", though I have no idea if we have the legal right to make that change. The Jakarta PMC can follow up on this: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-avalon-apps/enterprise/orb/src/java/ org/apache/orb/ORB.java.diff?r1=1.9&r2=1.10&diff_format=h AFAIK, there are no issues in commons-sandbox, though there are a bunch of java files with invalid copyright lines (no date) and 130 java files with no copyright description at all. BTW, no, I should not need to point this out to the project or the PMC. The definition of maintaining oversight is that the people having that responsibility are supposed to see when these problems are created. If they do not see it, then they aren't maintaining oversight. ....Roy
regards,
michael
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
