"Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/12/2002 08:07:38 PM:
> Henri wrote: > > i) Does it have a suitable level of javadoc. Not enough for an actual > > release, but the bare minimum. > > ii) Does it have maturity. That is, has it spent some time in the sandbox > > while the developers use it, modified versions or extended versions > > in other projects. > > iii) Does the project contain enough in the way of Unit Tests to show that > > the developers are serious about testing. > > iv) Is there a community, or is it a single developer. Does it have link > > to another project which will show a scope for its community growth. > > v) Does it have a webpage yet? > > [email] needs unit tests +1. > [email] needs a webpage It already has one. See http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/email/ > [email] needs evidence of more than one commons committer willing to apply > patches/support. So far we've had Jon, Sam and myself jumping in. Is that not more than one? > [email] needs to change its package name or component name (the package is > mail not email) +1. > I agree that its time to get this one promoted. This will require a promotion of util, wont it? If email is to go to Commons Proper, and it depends on util and an unreleased lang, don't we need to get all three in a ready state? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
