surely, the most important criteria has been missed:
email needs a PROPOSAL document.
- robert
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 09:07 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Henri wrote:
i) Does it have a suitable level of javadoc. Not enough for an actual
release, but the bare minimum.
ii) Does it have maturity. That is, has it spent some time in the
sandbox
while the developers use it, modified versions or extended versions
in other projects.
iii) Does the project contain enough in the way of Unit Tests to show
that
the developers are serious about testing.
iv) Is there a community, or is it a single developer. Does it have link
to another project which will show a scope for its community growth.
v) Does it have a webpage yet?
[email] needs unit tests
[email] needs a webpage
[email] needs evidence of more than one commons committer willing to apply
patches/support.
[email] needs to change its package name or component name (the package is
mail not email)
I agree that its time to get this one promoted.
Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
