And I meant to add to this: If it would be helpful to do a pseduo-release, at least tagging a stable branch that you could work from, that would be easy enough to do.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > I dropped [cache] into the sandbox quite some time age. At the time we > were kicking around various commons-cache notions. The [simplestore] > component was created a bit later, with a slightly different but > overlapping scope, but has similiarly languished. > > While the [cache] code hasn't been touched in quite some time, it is quite > stable and functional, in fact, it is a direct repackaging of code that I > did use and still use regularly for production deployments. I haven't had > the inclination or the need to change it much (well, literally at all > IIRC). If I had to do it over again, I'd probably simplify it > dramatically. I wasn't nearly as bitten by the extreme bug at the time. > > I don't have a substantial amount of time to work on cache at this time, > but if you're interested in moving forward with it, I'd suggest we try to > refine it a bit in the sandbox before proposing it for commons proper. > (Since the code has sat untouched for over a year, a proposal right now is > virtually guaranteed to fail.) > > Some changes that I think I'd like to see: > > * add javadocs and additional documentation > > * replace the jocl configuration with something else (derived from jelly? > digester?) > > * remove or revise the Cache.getStat functionality, its too complicated > and I'm not sure I've even used it > > * remove or revise the remote package. it was never completed > > Lance, were there any changes you had in mind? > > Actually, poking around in this I might be feeling some itches to scratch. > > Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Lavandowska wrote: > > > I've used cache a few times, and with the recent talk about betwixt I > > was wondering if there is any reason cache couldn't have a release as > > well? I checked bugzilla and didn't find any issues logged against > > cache. > > > > It looks like nothing has changed since the initial checkin by > > Rodney... I'm guessing that is a vote against promoting cache out of > > the sandbox? > > > > Lance > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
