What's the difference between this and Stratum which is also a caching mechanism, I believe.
For what kind of apps could I use this for? WebBased getting info from a DB? /c ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney Waldhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [cache] Release? > And I meant to add to this: > > If it would be helpful to do a pseduo-release, at least tagging a stable > branch that you could work from, that would be easy enough to do. > > On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > I dropped [cache] into the sandbox quite some time age. At the time we > > were kicking around various commons-cache notions. The [simplestore] > > component was created a bit later, with a slightly different but > > overlapping scope, but has similiarly languished. > > > > While the [cache] code hasn't been touched in quite some time, it is quite > > stable and functional, in fact, it is a direct repackaging of code that I > > did use and still use regularly for production deployments. I haven't had > > the inclination or the need to change it much (well, literally at all > > IIRC). If I had to do it over again, I'd probably simplify it > > dramatically. I wasn't nearly as bitten by the extreme bug at the time. > > > > I don't have a substantial amount of time to work on cache at this time, > > but if you're interested in moving forward with it, I'd suggest we try to > > refine it a bit in the sandbox before proposing it for commons proper. > > (Since the code has sat untouched for over a year, a proposal right now is > > virtually guaranteed to fail.) > > > > Some changes that I think I'd like to see: > > > > * add javadocs and additional documentation > > > > * replace the jocl configuration with something else (derived from jelly? > > digester?) > > > > * remove or revise the Cache.getStat functionality, its too complicated > > and I'm not sure I've even used it > > > > * remove or revise the remote package. it was never completed > > > > Lance, were there any changes you had in mind? > > > > Actually, poking around in this I might be feeling some itches to scratch. > > > > Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Lavandowska wrote: > > > > > I've used cache a few times, and with the recent talk about betwixt I > > > was wondering if there is any reason cache couldn't have a release as > > > well? I checked bugzilla and didn't find any issues logged against > > > cache. > > > > > > It looks like nothing has changed since the initial checkin by > > > Rodney... I'm guessing that is a vote against promoting cache out of > > > the sandbox? > > > > > > Lance > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
