I have some other small requirements for supporting (as opposed to -1 ing ) promotion.
[net] currently contains two packages o.a.commons.io o.a.commons.util These packages need to be renamed to be o.a.commons.net.io o.a.commons.net.util Also, some of the licences in the source files refer to the turbine licence, not the commons licence. This should be changed. Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey D. Brekke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: Re: [net] momentum for promotion? > "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [SNIPPED] > > > In any case, I'm +1 on a promotion with the condition that unit tests will > > be the first order of business before any major development initiative is > > undertaken. i.e., we'll fix bugs but won't apply new functionality patches > > until we've established a unit test framework. > > I'm +1 on a 1.0 / promotion also with the above conditions and two more small items: > > o A migration document for moving from NetComponents -> Commons/Net > ( Should be real simple, just package name changes ) > > o Move the org.apache.commons.net.ftp.ftp2 package into a proposal directory so it is not in the released jar. > > If no one beats me too it I'll get the above two items done this weekend. > > jb > > -- > ===================================================================== > Jeffrey D. Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Wisconsin, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
