On 5 Feb 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:11, David Dixon-Peugh wrote: > > The nsUML stuff isn't central to the Graph package. > > > > Indeed it might be better off if it isn't included > > in the Jars. I can see taking some of the domain > > packages and distributing them separately. > > > > (Its doubtful that many people need to convert > > statecharts from UML into Graphs for manipulation.) > > These are the kinds of things that shouldn't be necessary though. It's > in there because it was serving a purpose and needs to be removed > because of bureaucratic nonsense. It just doesn't sit well. Is it bureaucratic or idealogical? If the ASF website is breaking the rules of a GPL licence, can the ASF complain when another entity breaks their licence? Is it a case of 'practice what you preach'? Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
