Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2003 11:28:55 AM:
> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There is a third option: > > > > 3) Remove graph2 from commons. > > I wouldn't presume to do that on my own recognizance, > but if all the graph2 developers decided to go that > way, that would be fine. Seems like overkill for the > sake of two classes, but I have no idea how important > they are to Maven or other dependant projects not > tracked by GUMP. Removing graph2 from Commons still > may mean that it can't be used in other Jakarta > software, depending on how the board decides to > interpret the LGPL and viral licensing. > > Don't shoot the messenger, I don't care one whit about > the holy wars. In fact, the only reason I know what > license nsUML uses is because last week I researched > the project so I could have an informed opinion on how > to fix the GUMP build for graph, so we could make some > progress on Maven nightlies. Hey, I'm not shooting anybody, I'm just making sure we cover all options. [snip] > This is me being proactive. And it works for me. I like proactive. We just need to keep our minds clear about what our options are. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
