DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14983>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14983 GenericObjectPool should allow for manual population of the pool ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 15:42 ------- And I meant to add to that last post: This is one of the nice things about the current method signature: "void addObject();". It still forces the client to obtain the added object via the borrowObject interface. addObject(Object) is a little more dangerous in that way, since it is possible for the client to use the added object without obtaining it from the pool. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
