DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17214>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17214 "depends" property of the "validator" element is ignored [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 20:41 ------- Orginally, there was an implicit requires behind each validator. But that didn't allow for people to say "if (and only if) they enter an email address, make sure it's in the proper format, but null is OK too." So, the requires was recently made explicit. (And is documented as such in the Validator Developers Guide.) The purpose of the depends property is to list which validators are to be applied to the field. The real issue might be the term "depends". Perhaps it should be something like "validator" or "uses" instead. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
