DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19857>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19857 Methods ConvertUtilsBean.convert could check for converters registered with base classes ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-16 12:33 ------- Primarily my code is abstract, that means the class Enum does not know nothing about having sub-classes or not. It just makes sure that every son implements two methods, thats all. Using a constructor is exactly the thing, that I do not want to allow! So consequently the constructor for Enum is 'private'. When you think of the class Boolean, then there should only be one instance of Boolean.TRUE and Boolean.FALSE. Maybe those problems can be solved with Java 1.5 using the builtin enumeration type, but so far I will have to provide a big table with all sons of my Enum class. Sad but true. Poor object orientation! Thank you anyway --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
