DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21053>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21053

URL codec contribution from HttpClient





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-06-27 20:41 -------
This is an eternal conflict of good vs. evil, code reuse + greater complexity
vs. code duplication + somewhat lesser complexity. And there will never be a
clear winner, I am afraid. Yet, I agree, a common strategy seems necessary.

I apologize for asking twice: Is there still anything that remains to be done on
my part in order to get the patch approved? What is the next step in the process?

Oleg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to