Hi, all! JMcN> I am the primary developer of the jdbc2pool and cpdsadapter packages. JMcN> I do not see any reason to merge the code into one package with the rest JMcN> of dbcp. They seem packaged appropriately to me. The main thing that JMcN> needs to be done here is to rename the "jdbc2" in the names to something JMcN> else. I don't know what is a better name, but we should not release JMcN> with "jdbc" in the class or package names.
Have looked at jdbc2pool a couple of weeks ago (we have probably both participated in the bugzilla discussion, didn't we? :) To me jdbc2pool looked not ready for a release. On the other hand cpdsadapter and the rest of dbcp looked like after a bit of work (in which Serge Knystautas will probably participate :-) they will be quite ready for a release. Do you agree? (That there may be a release soon, but without jdbc2 part, not to hold the progress ?) JMcN> If anyone wants to become an active developer on dbcp, they are welcome Not right now, but the subject is certainly hot :-) DG> As for the "deluge" of commons-dev mail, it has been suggested DG> that DBCP move to db-commons which would alleviate that problem. Is there much chance this will happen? SK> Anybody know what Tomcat is using at this point? Indeed would be interesting to see that :-) - Anton --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
