Re: DBCP status?

[Martin Poeschl]

Juozas Baliuka wrote:

I see it was a very big mistake to add AbandonedObjectPool, it was added for
debugging but people misunderstanding it.
I think we need to deprecate or remove it.
+1

was it part of the 1.0 release??

martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: DBCP status?
 

This entire thread has been filled with reasons to not support closing
abandoned connections.  If you need to have this behavior, you will need
to customize DBCP for your apps because it should not be built in.
     

Actually, I would characterize it that abandoned connection handling is an
FAQ item *and* a polarizing one.  Yes, there have been reasons to not
support closing abandoned connections.  And just as loudly have been
   

people
 

saying that they need it.

Personally, I am still in a listening mode (plus I've been head down
   

working
 

on a new server deployment).  I've some thoughts, but I also knew that
   

Serge
 

was off-line for a bit (and had a bunch of changes already on his local
drive), so I was waiting for him to return, too.
--- Noel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]