> > Some of the "AbandonedTrace" behavior is still necessary to implement
> > the JDBC specification. Connections still need to track outstanding
> > statements and results sets, which are closed by Connection.close().
> Agreed, but the way it was implemented was completely wrong. The behavior
> should not have been in a superclass and forced unrelated classes to
> subclass it.
I actually had a sentence about that, but I removed it.
> Let DBCP focus on it's core responsibilities and provide easy
> hooks to allow logging, policy decisions, etc.
What hooks do you see as necessary in the base class(es)?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
