We are here: (1) DoubleMetaphone unit tests.
See http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22401 (2) URLCodec urldecode() and urlencode() method names change? Done. (3) Provide a package.html for org/apache/commons/codec/net Done. New/Optional(3.1) Provide the high-level stuff that is now in org/apache/commons/codec/ package.html in an overview.html and refer to it from the build ant Javadoc task, except that (1) I do not see a mapping to -overview in the Ant docs and (2) do we use maven to build? (I do not know much about maven). (4) Release. To do... Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:42 > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: RE: [codec] To do for 1.1.1 > > So, to do for 1.1.1: > > (1) DoubleMetaphone unit tests. > (2) URLCodec urldecode() and urlencode() method names change? > (3) Provide a package.html for org/apache/commons/codec/net > (4) Release. > > Tim: " I've done the release work in the past, be happy to do it again. > Or, > if you would like, I'd be glad to have another partner in crime." > > I can find some time to help, I'll need some how-to pointers. > > Thanks, > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:39 > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: RE: [codec] To do for 1.1.1 > > Here is another codec issue. > > In URLCodec there are too oddly named methods: urldecode() and > urlencode(). > The word-style caps are missing. I suggest these be renamed to decodeUrl() > and encodeUrl(). > > Thoughts? > > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:18 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [codec] To do for 1.1.1 > > I've done the release work in the past, be happy to do it again. Or, if > you would like, I'd be glad to have another partner in crime. > > When B. Walstrum submitted the code for DoubleMetaphone, I assigned an > issue to him for a unit test. I haven't seen any action as of yet from > him. > > I'd say in addition to a unit test for DoubleMetaphone, we're lacking good > documentation (compared to Digester). > > Tim > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Hello Codec, > > > > So, is the only to-do for a codec 1.1.1 a DoubleMetaphone unit test? > > > > Who knows enough to write one and has the time to do so? > > > > Who does the release work for this component? > > > > Gary > > > > -- > ---------------------- > Tim O'Brien > Evanston, IL > (847) 863-7045 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
