Folks, I got indeed swamped with e-mails after having subscribed to Geronimo's mailing list. sorry about that.
I already responded to Tim that I had no objections. Feel free to rename the methods as you see fit. Oleg On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 04:50, Henri Yandell wrote: > Unless Oleg is a member of Codec, the 2 day notice is pretty good. > Chances are he is either swamped, or on vacation, but with CVS it can > always be rolled back. > > I think the only politeness you need to worry about here is not to have > these kind of things happening in the last week of release, so there is a > good couple of weeks before a release for Oleg to speak up. > > Just as a general guesstimate at jakartiquette. No idea about how the ASF > way would handle it :) > > Hen > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Is Oleg on vacation per chance? Not monitoring this list perhaps? > > > > Should we rename the methods to conform to proper casing and a more readable > > verb-noun in case no answer comes forth soon? > > > > Gary > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tim OBrien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:49 > > > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > > > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: RE: [codec] To do for 1.1.1 > > > > > > CC'ing Oleg K. Any issues with changing the capitalization on URLCodec > > > methods, per Gary's suggestion? > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:39 PM > > > > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > > > > Subject: RE: [codec] To do for 1.1.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is another codec issue. > > > > > > > > In URLCodec there are too oddly named methods: urldecode() > > > > and urlencode(). The word-style caps are missing. I suggest > > > > these be renamed to decodeUrl() and encodeUrl(). > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:18 > > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > > Subject: Re: [codec] To do for 1.1.1 > > > > > > > > I've done the release work in the past, be happy to do it > > > > again. Or, if > > > > you would like, I'd be glad to have another partner in crime. > > > > > > > > When B. Walstrum submitted the code for DoubleMetaphone, I > > > > assigned an > > > > issue to him for a unit test. I haven't seen any action as > > > > of yet from > > > > him. > > > > > > > > I'd say in addition to a unit test for DoubleMetaphone, we're > > > > lacking good > > > > documentation (compared to Digester). > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Codec, > > > > > > > > > > So, is the only to-do for a codec 1.1.1 a DoubleMetaphone unit test? > > > > > > > > > > Who knows enough to write one and has the time to do so? > > > > > > > > > > Who does the release work for this component? > > > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ---------------------- > > > > Tim O'Brien > > > > Evanston, IL > > > > (847) 863-7045 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
