Tim Reilly wrote:
Thanks for the positive response to adapting a UUID class in commons lang.
[The Axis list has responded with favoring option 2 which is basically to
not make changes at this time, but has no problem with use of the UUID code
from Axis in the commons.]
I'm looking for direction on next steps - I believe after answering the
following questions; I would create an enhancement in bugzilla and attach
patches or sources?

Yes. I would start by patching IdentifierUtils (see below) to add some additional methods, assuming that there are no objections to this approach.



I think at this time there are two questions to resolve:


~1) Where to place the UUID code.
I personally prefer a package and separate classes as Phil Steitz suggests:
"

I do like the idea of lang providing a home for "IdentifierUtils" suitably
named and packaged.  There are really multiple types here:

* UUID (pseudo) standard, non-random, non-secure
* Random, non-secure, not guaranteed unique (e.g. RandomStringUtils)
* Random, "secure", not guaranteed unique (e.g. Tomcat session IDs)
* Part random, "secure", guaranteed unique (what Tomcat really needs ;-)
* Bounded sequential(e.g. Betwixt's io identifiers)
* Cyclic"


I believe the alternative is to add the UUID code to the existing
IdentifierUtils.java.


Sorry, I had forgotten about the existing IdentifierUtils. I would suggest that all of the things above could be added there, at least to start.

(As a user of the library I believe it would be much easier to locate and so
more valuable to have in a "suitably named  package" of IdentifierUtils.)

~2) Which UUID implementation to use:
Tim Anderson suggested using:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tyrex/tyrex/src/main/tyrex/se
rvices/UUID.java?rev=1.6 I think this is a good suggestion. Does anyone know
if there are any issues with the license on this. It seems it would be okay
as long as this license information were included along with the apache
license in the source. (Would we also need an additional UUID-License.txt?
I'm not sure how to interpret item 2 of license) The alternative is to use
the Axis UUID and add features such as those in Tyrex's later. If a real
issue exists I could try contacting them so find a suitable solution.

I don't know about the license, but as I said above, I like the tyrex impl better. In any case, making the implementation threadsafe would be a good idea, as would (IMHO) allowing the node ID to be read from a properties file. I would also be interested in others' opinions on the value of the UUID "standard", especially minus the MAC address.


Phil




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to