+1, with the same experience. For >2.0. Gary
> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 19:46 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: UUID Reuse proposal > > From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:05 AM > Subject: Re: UUID Reuse proposal > > > <SNIP> > > Sorry, I had forgotten about the existing IdentifierUtils. I would > > suggest that all of the things above could be added there, at least to > > start. > > > As a long time user of a UUID class, I would suggest *not* adding it to > the > existing IdentifierUtils class. There is more than enough behavior in a > UUID > to warrant its own class, even if most of that behavior revolves around > creating immutable instances of itself. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
