DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22826>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22826 [collections] List/Set implementation. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-20 15:41 ------- I worked on this and got it all setup, however it has a problem with performance as it is based solely on the ArrayList class. All add/remove/contains etc have to scan the array to find the match, which will be slow. The OrderedSet decorator can be made to implement List, and will perform better as it has both a List and Set internally. Is there a case for both types? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
