DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22826>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22826 [collections] List/Set implementation. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-22 20:59 ------- The problem is that it is impossible for both the List and Set interfaces to be implemented in one class. Note especially the hashCode and equals. I really don't want to add misbehaving classes to [collections]. With ordered set I have provided List-like methods without implementing List. One possible solution would be a SetList decorator, that implements List but acts like a Set. Then users could choose which to use. Maybe the last attachment could be used as a basis for this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
