Unless I'm dreaming, the Transformer code is in there... Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:54 AM Subject: [collections] Should LazyMap use a Transformer instead of a Factory?
> When a LazyMap creates a value on demand, it seems natural to use a > Transformer that takes the key as input. In many (most?) cases, the key > might be ignored, but it makes sense to make it available. LazyMap does > have a protected Transformer member that it uses to create values, but > the decorate method takes a Factory (which is converted to an > effectively argumentless Transformer using > TransformerUtils.asTransformer(Factory)). Why not have decorate take a > Transformer? This would seem to be more flexible. Am I missing something? > > Phil > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
