Sorry. Yes, it was me who was dreaming -- I misread the code. The functionality that I was looking for is there.
Phil --- Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless I'm dreaming, the Transformer code is in there... > Stephen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:54 AM > Subject: [collections] Should LazyMap use a Transformer instead of a > Factory? > > > > When a LazyMap creates a value on demand, it seems natural to use a > > Transformer that takes the key as input. In many (most?) cases, the key > > might be ignored, but it makes sense to make it available. LazyMap does > > have a protected Transformer member that it uses to create values, but > > the decorate method takes a Factory (which is converted to an > > effectively argumentless Transformer using > > TransformerUtils.asTransformer(Factory)). Why not have decorate take a > > Transformer? This would seem to be more flexible. Am I missing > something? > > > > Phil > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
