--- robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we've talked before about removing the dependency of beanutils on > collections. there are two parts to this, the first is to come up with > a solution to the issue of fasthashmap,
FastHashMap states that it's not completely portable across JVM implementations which, IMO, means it (or similarly implemented Maps) shouldn't be used. Using a standard HashMap would be better. David > the second is what to do about > BeanPropertyValueChangeClosure, BeanPropertyValueEqualsPredicate and > BeanToPropertyValueTransformer. > > i'd like to propose that we solve the second problem by a home for > optional classes with non-core dependencies and move these classes into > it. > > i'd prefer to use a maven-friendly subdirectory called 'optional' with > commons/beanutils with a complete maven-friendly directory structure. > for distribution, we create a beanutils-optional.jar but include that > within the main distribution (in a similar way to ant). > > comments please :) > > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
