Quoting robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
<snip>
i'd prefer to use a maven-friendly subdirectory called 'optional' with commons/beanutils with a complete maven-friendly directory structure. for distribution, we create a beanutils-optional.jar but include that within the main distribution (in a similar way to ant).
So, this would be beanutils/src/optional to parallel beanutils/src/java? And
the package name on the classes would stay the same? If so, +1.
with maven, i think that it'd probably be easier to organize the files thus:
beanutils -- src/java/org/apache/commons/...
|
-- optional -- src/java/org/apache/commons/...and have a subsidary project.xml file in the optional directory. (the ant build script can easily work either way.) but i'll need to give it a try first. since the response seems to be generally positive, i'll have a play sometime soonish so that i can come back with something more solid.
and yes, we can keep the same package name :)
- robert
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
