I'm using GenericObjectPool and I'm seeing the "numActive" value go negative occasionally (and stay there). Looking at recent commons-dev emails, I saw a similar discussion and patch applied to DBCP's AbandonedObjectPool. It looks to me like the analysis and patch for AbandonedObjectPool could correctly apply to the GenericObjectPool superclass. Yes?
Thanks, Lee --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
