Even though AbandonedObjectPool extends GenericObjectPool, the fix for one is probably not the fix for the other. I've debugged GenericObjectPool numActive problems a lot these past few weeks, so if there are more, I'd be glad to help find them. In what context are you using GenericObjectPool? Are you using GenericObjectPool with your own application? With dbcp? With Tomcat? If Tomcat, what version of Tomcat?
Wayne Lee Breisacher wrote: > I'm using GenericObjectPool and I'm seeing the "numActive" value go > negative occasionally (and stay there). Looking at recent commons-dev > emails, I saw a similar discussion and patch applied to DBCP's > AbandonedObjectPool. It looks to me like the analysis and patch for > AbandonedObjectPool could correctly apply to the GenericObjectPool > superclass. Yes? > > Thanks, > > Lee > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
