Will link to old version and make this change later in the week.
Monday/Tuesday nights are tight on time for the next couple of months.

Hen

On Mon, 24 May 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote:

> I would suggest that we stick to the voted decision of this list, lazily
> approved by the PMC, which includes removing sections 2 and 3.
>
> Perhaps Jakarta as a whole doesn't have a mechanism for having a charter
> different from a proposal. Whatever, that is what makes sense for commons.
> And as the history shows, this file has already been changed before in
> significant ways.
>
> Thus:
> - the charter is the amended document as voted on
> - we should provide a link to the original proposal
>
> Stephen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 2 + 3 are both a bit pointless in a charter, they only seem to have a
> > point in a proposal for a sub-project. I'll keep them in however. 4 is
> > also quite pointless for a charter, so leaving them in for a later
> > discussion on removing all 3.
> >
> > How would you change:
> >
> > "The following charter for Jakarta Commons was initially approved by the
> > Jakarta Project Management Committee on March 19, 2001. The latest
> > version, 1.1, was approved by the PMC on _date_."
> >
> > to represent your second paragraph?
> >
> > We could link to the CVS history page;
> >
> >
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons/commons-build/xdocs/charte
> r.xml
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Sun, 23 May 2004, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
> >
> > > Sections 2 and 3 are part of the "form" requested by the Jakarta PMC as
> > > part of a sub-project proposal (this info used to live at
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html before the incubator
> > > came into being.)  I'm not sure why we'd want to remove this
> information,
> > > although it might make sense to note where reality deviated from the
> plan.
> > >
> > > Also note the comment at the top the charter page.  This was the
> specific
> > > proposal approved by the PMC.  If we want to make revisions or comments
> to
> > > that charter, so be it, but let's not pretend that the revision is the
> > > history.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 May 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > [hopefully all these general emails won't mean that only one turns
> into a
> > > > living thread]
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to try and get us moving forward on the Commons charter a
> bit.
> > > > It's easy to turn this into a long series of misunderstood arguments,
> so
> > > > my first suggestion is hopefully something very unargumentative.
> > > >
> > > > [cf http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/charter.html]
> > > >
> > > > I'm proposing that we:
> > > >
> > > > **
> > > > Remove (1.5.2) as it has never happened and is nothing our community
> is
> > > > striving to make happen. This also involves a FAQ entry on the
> directory
> > > > being removed.
> > > >
> > > > Remove (2) as this is not relevant to the charter nowadays, plus it's
> not
> > > > even an accurate representation of the original components. If this
> > > > information is deemed useful, we need to ask Craig to give us another
> > > > history lesson and make some notes, probably elsewhere.
> > > >
> > > > Remove (3) as it is no longer relevant and should be documented in an
> > > > available resources section. [ie) can a new Commons component use
> JIRA,
> > > > where is our wiki etc].
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > > I don't believe any of these are too big a deal and getting things
> moving
> > > > will give us a foundation for future discussions. I think that a
> typical 3
> > > > +1 and no -1 vote should be fine for such a thing [unless anyone knows
> of
> > > > obscure rules], and will plan to send out such a vote on the above if
> no
> > > > discussion occurs.
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to