DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 [collection] ListOrderedSet doesn't implements SortedSet ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-04 07:36 ------- I don't fully agree. >From the javadoc for a SortedSet: "sorted according to the natural ordering of its elements (see Comparable), or by a Comparator provided at sorted set creation time." A "UnmodifiableListOrderedSet" would obey this rule as the "comparator" would be provided at creation time through the list. It is discutable as soon as more than 1 element can be added to the set as the "comparator" would not only need the information provided at creation time but should know about the previous additions. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
