DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 [collection] ListOrderedSet doesn't implements SortedSet ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-04 22:29 ------- ListOrderedSet does not currently hold a Comparator as an instance variable, nor should it. This class aims to solve the problem of keeping the Set in the same order as elements are added. Looking at the SortedSet interface, the comparator() method is irrelevant, first () and last() could be supported. The set views head/tail/sub all rely on a comparator based ordering. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
