DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977 ProxyOutpoutStream: no need to define proxy ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-14 08:34 ------- - With the out member I mean that the superclass FilterOutputStream has already the a protected member "out" that references proxied stream. The proxy-member of the ProxyOutputStream references the same stream like the FilterOutputStream.out member - so I think the ProcyOutputStream.proxy is obsolete. You could directly use the FilterOutputStream.out member. - getProxy()/setProxy(): You could pass the ProxyOS to an object that writes to an OS. If the object doesn't support a set/getOS (perhaps its final) you could use the ProxyOS to do this. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
